I'm going to approach Mr. Stupart's article from two perspectives:
- He's right.
- But the focus really should be on "The result has been a boom in tour companies offering voluntourism opportunities in a wide range of destinations, catering to all levels of commitment."
Mr. Stupart sums it up nicely and as accurately as I've ever seen it put. "There can be no easy decisions when attempting to weigh up how to volunteer, or whether to volunteer at all. Nevertheless, there is a world of difference between ill-considered decisions taken for the purpose of stroking a traveler's ego, and subjective decisions to volunteer after properly considering as much of the moral and practical detail of your engagement as possible."
For quite sometime, GeoVisions has provided a document, "Where Does My Money Go" in answer to that exact question by some of our volunteers. And on many of our program pages, we actually provide a list of items that get paid with a volunteer's money. This activity came with trying to be "all things transparent."
How wonderful would it be if all of the responsible voluntourism providers (really, there are a few) wrote their own document explaining why volunteers participate on their projects and precisely (measured objectively) what good comes from it.
- How will your work be more beneficial than sending money?
- If you and your friends invested money in a project abroad (after doing research and interviewing project directors), would that be more sustainable?
- On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the highest, how much of wanting to go abroad is all about your ego? Or that you had horrible parents?
- Why aren't you voluntouring in your own country?
- Why are you taking a tax deduction on volunteering abroad? Why aren't you spending money in your own country, and giving up the tax deduction to pay your fair share?
- How much research did you do about where you're going and why you should even be there?
Those are questions we have been asking ourselves here at GeoVisions over the last year. And what are the answers?
When we answered these questions we closed 50 of our voluntourism projects. We have only a few now and most of them are hands-on medical for people going into or already in the medical field. We have a last few remaining "long tails" and most will be fading away over the course of 2012.
But GeoVisions is in business, right? So what are we doing instead?
Glad you asked. We invented programs that focus on cultural exchange first. Then, if you want, you can do some volunteering like teaching a family conversational English or helping kids with their homework. Something that first of all exchanges two cultures, something that then focuses on communicating with one another. And finally, something that allows for a little local volunteering and sharing.
Of course our most innovative programs were copied.
Last year I even saw 8 volunteer abroad senders providing the same program in India, all sending to the same receiver. All of the programs were packaged differently, all charging different prices. Never let it be said that some of my friendly competitors have but one brain shared between them all.
2 years ago GeoVisions could market our programs with two online search engines (we refuse to participate with Google Ad Words). Now we have a minimum of four additional search engines for volunteer and teach abroad. There are a multitude of online review sites…mini TripAdvisor sites trying to ratchet up online traffic and therefore dollars.
GeoVisions has double the competition we did from 2009. Double the senders, and probably more than double the receivers.
There are operators who start their Google Ads with, "Volunteer Abroad For $160" and "Volunteer Abroad - $180. American volunteers wanted for affordable volunteer trips abroad!"
When we all cash in, we ethically bankrupt ourselves.
When you look for ways to make money from an industry rather than looking for ways to serve that industry, you add to the problem. What am I writing? You ARE the problem.
When you use price to round up self-serving volunteers to attend flim-flam projects, you add to the problem. When you copy programs and other people's ideas, you add to the problem. When you don't belong to global organizations focused on building best practices, you add to the problem.
I have heard a few of my competitors say, "More volunteer abroad senders? Great, that means more volunteers out in the world." To that I reply, "Hogwash." The industry is watered-down because of those who have piled on and thought this might be an easy way to prey on well-meaning people and cash in. And on this, I am being very kind.
I continue to read publicly that "Voluntourism will likely always remain a compromised industry." Mr. Stupart even wrote that last week.
I do think it is interesting to note, as I end this post, that Save The Children does not allow volunteers on their projects. That is to say they do not allow you to call up, and explain that you want to go volunteer in Ethiopia on one of their end child hunger projects. You can volunteer in their Westport, CT or Washington, DC offices in marketing, finance and social media. But you're not allowed on a Save the Children project as a volunteer.
I hope, if you're reading this, you are not asking yourself, "why"?